london: was chosen during romans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, north america
Weight: 0.63
, birmingham
Weight: 0.62
, singapore
Weight: 0.62
, paris
Weight: 0.60
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, south america
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.37
, washington
Weight: 0.36
, central america
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was chosen during romans 1.00
was chosen 3 times for olympics 0.78
was chosen host 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(singapore, was chosen host)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(london, was chosen during romans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(london, was chosen during romans)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(singapore, was chosen host)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(london, was chosen during romans)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(singapore, was chosen host)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(singapore, was chosen host)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(london, was chosen during romans)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(london, was chosen during romans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(london, was chosen during romans)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(london, was chosen during romans)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(london, was chosen during romans)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(london, was chosen 3 times for olympics)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(london, was chosen during romans)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(london, was chosen 3 times for olympics)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(london, was chosen during romans)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(london, was chosen 3 times for olympics)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(london, was chosen during romans)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(london, was chosen 3 times for olympics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(london, was chosen during romans)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(london, was chosen during romans)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(london, was chosen during romans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(london, was chosen during romans)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(london, was chosen during romans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(london, was chosen during romans)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(singapore, was chosen host)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(london, was chosen during romans)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(singapore, was chosen host)