london: was named london

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, north america
Weight: 0.63
, birmingham
Weight: 0.62
, singapore
Weight: 0.62
, paris
Weight: 0.60
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, south america
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.37
, washington
Weight: 0.36
, central america
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was named london 1.00
be named london 0.99
was called london 0.95
be called london 0.94
be called new london 0.92
was important as place in shakespearean london 0.90
is is held in london 0.89
be called london town 0.88
was important as place of trade in shakespearean london 0.86
perceive london 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(london, was named london)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(london, was named london)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(london, was named london)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(london, was called london)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(london, was named london)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(london, be called london)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(london, was named london)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(london, was called london)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(london, was named london)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(london, be called london)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(london, was named london)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(london, perceive london)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(london, was named london)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(london, perceive london)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(london, was named london)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(london, was called london)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(london, was named london)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(london, be called london)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(london, was named london)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(london, was called london)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(london, was named london)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(london, be called london)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(london, was named london)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(london, perceive london)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(london, was named london)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(london, perceive london)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(london, was named london)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(london, was named london)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(london, was named london)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(london, was named london)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(london, was named london)