london: was rebuilt after great fire 1666

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, north america
Weight: 0.63
, birmingham
Weight: 0.62
, singapore
Weight: 0.62
, paris
Weight: 0.60
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, south america
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.37
, washington
Weight: 0.36
, central america
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was rebuilt after great fire 1666 1.00
was affected after great fire 0.87
was built on thames 0.81
be built on thames 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(london, was rebuilt after great fire 1666) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(london, was rebuilt after great fire 1666)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(london, was rebuilt after great fire 1666) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(london, was affected after great fire)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(london, was rebuilt after great fire 1666) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(london, was affected after great fire)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(london, was rebuilt after great fire 1666) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(london, was affected after great fire)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(london, was rebuilt after great fire 1666) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(london, was built on thames)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(london, was rebuilt after great fire 1666) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(london, be built on thames)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(london, was rebuilt after great fire 1666) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(london, was built on thames)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(london, was rebuilt after great fire 1666) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(london, was built on thames)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(london, was rebuilt after great fire 1666) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(london, be built on thames)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(london, was rebuilt after great fire 1666) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(london, be built on thames)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(london, was rebuilt after great fire 1666) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(london, was affected after great fire)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(london, was rebuilt after great fire 1666) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(london, was built on thames)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(london, was rebuilt after great fire 1666) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(london, be built on thames)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(london, was rebuilt after great fire 1666) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(london, was rebuilt after great fire 1666) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(london, was rebuilt after great fire 1666)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(london, was rebuilt after great fire 1666) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(london, was rebuilt after great fire 1666)