long hair: be better than short hair

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents detail
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, guy
Weight: 0.57
, stuff
Weight: 0.57
Siblings braid
Weight: 0.53
, hair color
Weight: 0.36
, pubic hair
Weight: 0.36
, hair gel
Weight: 0.35
, beard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than short hair 1.00
be better than hair 0.95
be more attractive than short hair 0.94
have short hair 0.94
be better than short 0.91
be more attractive than hair 0.88
has physical part hair 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(beard, has physical part hair)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(pubic hair, has physical part hair)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(pubic hair, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pubic hair, has physical part hair)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(beard, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(beard, has physical part hair)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(long hair, be better than short hair)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(long hair, have short hair)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(long hair, have short hair)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(long hair, have short hair)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(long hair, have short hair)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be better than short)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(long hair, be better than short)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(long hair, be more attractive than short hair)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(long hair, be better than short)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(long hair, be more attractive than short hair)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be more attractive than short hair)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(long hair, be more attractive than short hair)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(long hair, be better than hair)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(long hair, be better than short)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(long hair, has physical part hair)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(long hair, be more attractive than hair)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(long hair, be better than hair)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(long hair, has physical part hair)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(long hair, be more attractive than hair)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(long hair, be better than hair)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(long hair, has physical part hair)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be better than hair)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(long hair, has physical part hair)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be more attractive than hair)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(long hair, be more attractive than hair)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be better than short hair)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(long hair, be better than short hair)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pubic hair, has physical part hair)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be better than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(beard, has physical part hair)