long hair: be more attractive than short hair

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents detail
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, guy
Weight: 0.57
, stuff
Weight: 0.57
Siblings braid
Weight: 0.53
, hair color
Weight: 0.36
, pubic hair
Weight: 0.36
, hair gel
Weight: 0.35
, beard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more attractive than short hair 1.00
be more attractive than hair 0.97
be better than short hair 0.94
have short hair 0.89
be better than hair 0.88
be better than short 0.86
is attractive 0.82
be considered attractive 0.81
has physical part hair 0.81
be on guys attractive 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(beard, has physical part hair)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(braid, is attractive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(beard, is attractive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(pubic hair, has physical part hair)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(pubic hair, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pubic hair, has physical part hair)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(beard, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(beard, has physical part hair)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(beard, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(beard, is attractive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(braid, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(braid, is attractive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(long hair, be more attractive than short hair)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(long hair, have short hair)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(long hair, have short hair)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(long hair, have short hair)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(long hair, have short hair)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(long hair, be better than short hair)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(long hair, be better than short hair)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be better than short)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be better than short hair)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(long hair, be better than short)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(long hair, be better than short)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(long hair, be better than short hair)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(long hair, be better than short)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(long hair, be better than hair)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(long hair, be more attractive than hair)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(long hair, has physical part hair)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(long hair, be better than hair)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(long hair, be considered attractive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(long hair, be more attractive than hair)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(long hair, has physical part hair)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be on guys attractive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(long hair, is attractive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(long hair, be on guys attractive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(long hair, be better than hair)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(long hair, is attractive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(long hair, has physical part hair)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be more attractive than hair)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(long hair, be considered attractive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be considered attractive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(long hair, be more attractive than hair)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be better than hair)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(long hair, has physical part hair)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(long hair, be on guys attractive)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(long hair, is attractive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(long hair, be on guys attractive)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(long hair, be considered attractive)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(long hair, is attractive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be more attractive than short hair)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(long hair, be more attractive than short hair)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pubic hair, has physical part hair)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(beard, has physical part hair)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(beard, is attractive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be more attractive than short hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(braid, is attractive)