look: bad on snapchat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.60
, anything
Weight: 0.58
, situation
Weight: 0.57
, publication
Weight: 0.57
Siblings knee
Weight: 0.59
, come
Weight: 0.48
, rough
Weight: 0.46
, casual
Weight: 0.46
, view
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
bad on snapchat 1.00
is really bad 0.86
has quality bad 0.84
be terrible 0.82
be terrible with two around 0.81
be in between taste bad 0.79
be on half-elves negative 0.78
smell bad 0.78
be on half-elves 0.76
is on 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(anything, be in between taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(look, bad on snapchat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(look, bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(anything, be in between taste bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(look, bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(anything, be in between taste bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(look, bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(casual, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(look, bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(view, be on half-elves negative)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(look, bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(view, be on half-elves)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(look, bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(rough, is on)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(anything, be in between taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(look, bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(look, bad on snapchat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(look, bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(casual, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(casual, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(look, bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(rough, is on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(rough, is on)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(look, bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(view, be on half-elves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(view, be on half-elves)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(look, bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(view, be on half-elves negative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(view, be on half-elves negative)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(look, bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(look, bad on snapchat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(look, bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(look, bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(look, bad on snapchat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(look, bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(look, bad on snapchat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(look, bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(anything, be in between taste bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(look, bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(casual, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(look, bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(rough, is on)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(look, bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(view, be on half-elves)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(look, bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(view, be on half-elves negative)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(look, bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(anything, be in between taste bad)