los angeles: be better than new york

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san francisco
Weight: 0.72
, new mexico
Weight: 0.68
, california
Weight: 0.68
, chicago
Weight: 0.61
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.79
, san jose
Weight: 0.73
, san diego
Weight: 0.66
, seattle
Weight: 0.66
, san antonio
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than new york 1.00
be better than francisco 0.81
be warmer than oklahoma city 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(chicago, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(los angeles, be better than new york)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(los angeles, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(chicago, be better than new york)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be better than new york)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(chicago, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(los angeles, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be better than new york)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(los angeles, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(los angeles, be better than new york)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(los angeles, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(los angeles, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(los angeles, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(los angeles, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(los angeles, be warmer than oklahoma city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(los angeles, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(los angeles, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be better than new york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(los angeles, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(los angeles, be better than new york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(chicago, be better than new york)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(los angeles, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(chicago, be better than new york)