los angeles: be better than san francisco

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san francisco
Weight: 0.72
, new mexico
Weight: 0.68
, california
Weight: 0.68
, chicago
Weight: 0.61
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.79
, san jose
Weight: 0.73
, san diego
Weight: 0.66
, seattle
Weight: 0.66
, san antonio
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than san francisco 1.00
be warmer than san francisco 0.92
be hotter than san diego 0.91
be warmer than san diego 0.91
be better than francisco 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be better than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be warmer than san francisco)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be better than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(san jose, be warmer than san francisco)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(los angeles, be better than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(san jose, be warmer than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(san jose, be warmer than san francisco)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(los angeles, be better than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(seattle, be warmer than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(seattle, be warmer than san francisco)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(los angeles, be better than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(los angeles, be better than san francisco)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(los angeles, be better than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be warmer than san francisco)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(los angeles, be better than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be hotter than san diego)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(los angeles, be better than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be warmer than san diego)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(los angeles, be better than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(los angeles, be hotter than san diego)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(los angeles, be better than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(los angeles, be warmer than san francisco)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(los angeles, be better than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(los angeles, be warmer than san diego)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(los angeles, be better than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be hotter than san diego)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(los angeles, be better than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(los angeles, be hotter than san diego)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(los angeles, be better than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be warmer than san francisco)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(los angeles, be better than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be warmer than san diego)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(los angeles, be better than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(los angeles, be warmer than san francisco)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(los angeles, be better than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(los angeles, be warmer than san diego)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(los angeles, be better than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(los angeles, be better than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be better than san francisco)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(los angeles, be better than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(los angeles, be better than san francisco)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be better than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(seattle, be warmer than san francisco)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be better than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(san jose, be warmer than san francisco)