los angeles: have earthquakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san francisco
Weight: 0.72
, new mexico
Weight: 0.68
, california
Weight: 0.68
, chicago
Weight: 0.61
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.79
, san jose
Weight: 0.73
, san diego
Weight: 0.66
, seattle
Weight: 0.66
, san antonio
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
have earthquakes 1.00
be at risk of earthquake 0.85
be at risk for earthquake 0.84
prepare for earthquake 0.84
prepare for large earthquake 0.83
be at risk of catastrophic earthquake 0.83
be at risk for major earthquake 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(los angeles, have earthquakes)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(california, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(los angeles, have earthquakes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(california, have earthquakes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(california, have earthquakes)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(seattle, have earthquakes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(los angeles, have earthquakes)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(california, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(los angeles, have earthquakes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(seattle, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(seattle, have earthquakes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(los angeles, have earthquakes)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, prepare for large earthquake)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be at risk of catastrophic earthquake)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(los angeles, be at risk of catastrophic earthquake)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be at risk for major earthquake)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(los angeles, prepare for large earthquake)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(los angeles, be at risk for major earthquake)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be at risk of catastrophic earthquake)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(los angeles, prepare for large earthquake)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(los angeles, be at risk of catastrophic earthquake)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be at risk for major earthquake)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(los angeles, be at risk for major earthquake)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(los angeles, prepare for large earthquake)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, have earthquakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(los angeles, have earthquakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(california, have earthquakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(seattle, have earthquakes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(california, have earthquakes)