los angeles: is great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san francisco
Weight: 0.72
, new mexico
Weight: 0.68
, california
Weight: 0.68
, chicago
Weight: 0.61
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.79
, san jose
Weight: 0.73
, san diego
Weight: 0.66
, seattle
Weight: 0.66
, san antonio
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
is great 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(los angeles, is great)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(los angeles, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chicago, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(chicago, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is great)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(los angeles, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(los angeles, is great)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(los angeles, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(seattle, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(seattle, is great)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(los angeles, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(los angeles, is great)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(los angeles, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(los angeles, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, is great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(los angeles, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(los angeles, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chicago, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(seattle, is great)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(los angeles, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chicago, is great)