loss: actually work in competitive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disappointment
Weight: 0.64
, gain
Weight: 0.61
, injury
Weight: 0.60
, punishment
Weight: 0.59
Siblings absorption
Weight: 0.59
, net
Weight: 0.58
, lost
Weight: 0.58
, sack
Weight: 0.58
, departure
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
actually work in competitive 1.00
work in play 0.78
actually take place 0.76
work 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(gain, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(loss, actually work in competitive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(punishment, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(loss, actually work in competitive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(punishment, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(gain, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gain, work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(punishment, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(net, work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(absorption, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(gain, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(loss, actually work in competitive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(punishment, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(loss, actually work in competitive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(absorption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(absorption, work)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(net, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(net, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(loss, actually work in competitive)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(loss, actually take place)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(loss, actually take place)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(loss, actually take place)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(loss, actually take place)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(loss, actually work in competitive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(loss, actually work in competitive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(punishment, work)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gain, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(absorption, work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(net, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(punishment, work)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(loss, actually work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gain, work)