loss: be described as oxidation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disappointment
Weight: 0.64
, gain
Weight: 0.61
, injury
Weight: 0.60
, punishment
Weight: 0.59
Siblings absorption
Weight: 0.59
, net
Weight: 0.58
, lost
Weight: 0.58
, sack
Weight: 0.58
, departure
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be described as oxidation 1.00
be called oxidation 0.95
be equally as important as digestion 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(loss, be described as oxidation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(absorption, be equally as important as digestion)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(loss, be described as oxidation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(absorption, be equally as important as digestion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(absorption, be equally as important as digestion)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(loss, be described as oxidation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(loss, be described as oxidation)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(loss, be described as oxidation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(loss, be called oxidation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(loss, be described as oxidation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(loss, be called oxidation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(loss, be described as oxidation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(loss, be called oxidation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(loss, be described as oxidation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(loss, be called oxidation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(loss, be described as oxidation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(loss, be described as oxidation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(loss, be described as oxidation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(loss, be described as oxidation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(loss, be described as oxidation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(loss, be described as oxidation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(absorption, be equally as important as digestion)