loss: be on sale of asset added

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disappointment
Weight: 0.64
, gain
Weight: 0.61
, injury
Weight: 0.60
, punishment
Weight: 0.59
Siblings absorption
Weight: 0.59
, net
Weight: 0.58
, lost
Weight: 0.58
, sack
Weight: 0.58
, departure
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on sale of asset added 1.00
be on sale of asset 0.97
be on sale of fixed asset added 0.96
be on sale of fixed asset 0.94
be on sale added 0.90
has quality asset 0.87
be on sale 0.85
appear on asset side 0.85
be shown as asset 0.84
be on sale of equipment cash flows 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(gain, be on sale of equipment cash flows)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(loss, be on sale of asset added)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(gain, be on sale)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(loss, be on sale of asset added)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(gain, be on sale)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(gain, be on sale of equipment cash flows)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(gain, be on sale)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gain, be on sale of equipment cash flows)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(gain, be on sale of equipment cash flows)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(loss, be on sale of asset added)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(gain, be on sale)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(loss, be on sale of asset added)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(loss, be on sale of asset added)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(loss, be on sale of asset)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(loss, be on sale of fixed asset added)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(loss, be on sale added)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(loss, be on sale of fixed asset)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(loss, has quality asset)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(loss, appear on asset side)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(loss, appear on asset side)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(loss, be on sale)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(loss, has quality asset)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(loss, be shown as asset)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(loss, be shown as asset)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(loss, be on sale added)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(loss, has quality asset)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(loss, be on sale of fixed asset added)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(loss, be on sale added)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(loss, be on sale of asset)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(loss, be on sale of fixed asset)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(loss, be on sale of fixed asset added)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(loss, be on sale added)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(loss, appear on asset side)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(loss, be on sale of asset)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(loss, be on sale of fixed asset added)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(loss, be on sale of fixed asset)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(loss, be shown as asset)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(loss, be on sale)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(loss, be on sale of asset)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(loss, be on sale)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(loss, has quality asset)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(loss, be on sale)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(loss, be on sale of fixed asset)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(loss, be shown as asset)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(loss, appear on asset side)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(loss, be on sale of asset added)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(loss, be on sale of asset added)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(gain, be on sale)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(gain, be on sale of equipment cash flows)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(gain, be on sale)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(loss, be on sale of asset added)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(gain, be on sale of equipment cash flows)