loss: get calculated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disappointment
Weight: 0.64
, gain
Weight: 0.61
, injury
Weight: 0.60
, punishment
Weight: 0.59
Siblings absorption
Weight: 0.59
, net
Weight: 0.58
, lost
Weight: 0.58
, sack
Weight: 0.58
, departure
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
get calculated 1.00
be calculated 0.98
be worth calculated 0.90
work capital subtracted 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(loss, get calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(net, work capital subtracted)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(loss, get calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(net, be calculated)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(loss, get calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(net, be worth calculated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(loss, get calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(net, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(net, be calculated)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(loss, get calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(net, be worth calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(net, be worth calculated)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(loss, get calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(net, work capital subtracted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(net, work capital subtracted)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(loss, get calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(loss, get calculated)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(loss, get calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(loss, be calculated)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(loss, get calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(loss, be calculated)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(loss, get calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(loss, be calculated)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(loss, get calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(loss, be calculated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(loss, get calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(loss, get calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(loss, get calculated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(loss, get calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(loss, get calculated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(loss, get calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(net, be calculated)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(loss, get calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(net, be worth calculated)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(loss, get calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(net, work capital subtracted)