loss: have deductible tax

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disappointment
Weight: 0.64
, gain
Weight: 0.61
, injury
Weight: 0.60
, punishment
Weight: 0.59
Siblings absorption
Weight: 0.59
, net
Weight: 0.58
, lost
Weight: 0.58
, sack
Weight: 0.58
, departure
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
have deductible tax 1.00
is deductible 0.97
have tax 0.84
is income 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(loss, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(net, is income)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(loss, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(net, is income)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(net, is income)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(loss, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(loss, have deductible tax)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(loss, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(loss, is deductible)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(loss, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(loss, have tax)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(loss, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(loss, have tax)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(loss, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(loss, have tax)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(loss, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(loss, is deductible)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(loss, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(loss, have tax)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(loss, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(loss, is deductible)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(loss, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(loss, is deductible)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(loss, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(loss, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(loss, have deductible tax)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(loss, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(loss, have deductible tax)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(loss, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(net, is income)