lost: be iphone offline

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.63
, tv show
Weight: 0.62
, loss
Weight: 0.58
, cost
Weight: 0.57
, television show
Weight: 0.56
Siblings beat
Weight: 0.33
, falling
Weight: 0.32
, down
Weight: 0.32
, hurt
Weight: 0.32
, last
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be iphone offline 1.00
sound better on iphone 0.83
be off netflix 0.76
be on netflix instant 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lost, be iphone offline)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(beat, sound better on iphone)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lost, be iphone offline)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(beat, sound better on iphone)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(beat, sound better on iphone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lost, be iphone offline)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(lost, be iphone offline)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lost, be iphone offline)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(lost, be on netflix instant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(lost, be iphone offline)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(lost, be on netflix instant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(lost, be iphone offline)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(lost, be on netflix instant)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lost, be iphone offline)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(lost, be off netflix)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(lost, be iphone offline)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(lost, be off netflix)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(lost, be iphone offline)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(lost, be on netflix instant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(lost, be iphone offline)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lost, be off netflix)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(lost, be iphone offline)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(lost, be off netflix)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(lost, be iphone offline)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(lost, be iphone offline)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lost, be iphone offline)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(lost, be iphone offline)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(lost, be iphone offline)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lost, be iphone offline)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(beat, sound better on iphone)