lotion: is creamy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents moisturizer
Weight: 0.68
, product
Weight: 0.63
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.61
Siblings suntan lotion
Weight: 0.81
, deodorant
Weight: 0.36
, mouthwash
Weight: 0.36
, sunscreen
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is creamy 1.00
get runny 0.80
crust 0.79
get liquidy 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(lotion, is creamy)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, crust)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(lotion, is creamy)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(mouthwash, crust)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(mouthwash, crust)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(lotion, is creamy)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(lotion, is creamy)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(lotion, is creamy)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(lotion, get runny)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(lotion, is creamy)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(lotion, get runny)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(lotion, is creamy)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(lotion, get runny)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(lotion, is creamy)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(lotion, get liquidy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(lotion, is creamy)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(lotion, get liquidy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(lotion, is creamy)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(lotion, get liquidy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(lotion, is creamy)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lotion, get runny)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(lotion, is creamy)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(lotion, get liquidy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(lotion, is creamy)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(lotion, is creamy)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(lotion, is creamy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(lotion, is creamy)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(lotion, is creamy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(lotion, is creamy)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(mouthwash, crust)