lottery: be illegal in nevada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents story
Weight: 0.57
, prize
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, scheme
Weight: 0.55
, operation
Weight: 0.55
Siblings gambling
Weight: 0.33
, movie ticket
Weight: 0.33
, ticket
Weight: 0.32
, sweepstakes
Weight: 0.32
, jackpot
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal in nevada 1.00
be illegal in alabama 0.86
be illegal in india 0.86
is illegal 0.83
be in minnesota 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(lottery, be illegal in nevada)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, is illegal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(lottery, be illegal in nevada)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be in minnesota)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(lottery, be illegal in nevada)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(gambling, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gambling, is illegal)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(lottery, be illegal in nevada)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(gambling, be in minnesota)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(gambling, be in minnesota)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(lottery, be illegal in nevada)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(lottery, be illegal in nevada)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(lottery, be illegal in nevada)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(lottery, be illegal in alabama)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(lottery, be illegal in nevada)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(lottery, be illegal in alabama)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(lottery, be illegal in nevada)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(lottery, be illegal in alabama)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(lottery, be illegal in nevada)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(lottery, is illegal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(lottery, be illegal in nevada)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(lottery, is illegal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(lottery, be illegal in nevada)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lottery, is illegal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(lottery, be illegal in nevada)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lottery, be illegal in india)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(lottery, be illegal in nevada)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(lottery, be illegal in alabama)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(lottery, be illegal in nevada)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(lottery, be illegal in india)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(lottery, be illegal in nevada)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lottery, is illegal)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(lottery, be illegal in nevada)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lottery, be illegal in india)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(lottery, be illegal in nevada)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(lottery, be illegal in india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(lottery, be illegal in nevada)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(lottery, be illegal in nevada)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(lottery, be illegal in nevada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(lottery, be illegal in nevada)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(lottery, be illegal in nevada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(lottery, be illegal in nevada)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(gambling, is illegal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(lottery, be illegal in nevada)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(gambling, be in minnesota)