lotus: have leaves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flower
Weight: 0.63
, water plant
Weight: 0.61
, company
Weight: 0.59
, motif
Weight: 0.58
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.55
Siblings chrysanthemum
Weight: 0.35
, lily
Weight: 0.35
, marigold
Weight: 0.35
, hydrangea
Weight: 0.35
, hibiscus
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have leaves 1.00
leaves answer 0.87
leaves float 0.85
have broad leaves 0.84
leaves float on water 0.83
have waxy leaves 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hibiscus, have leaves)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(hydrangea, have leaves)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(hibiscus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(hibiscus, have leaves)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(hydrangea, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hydrangea, have leaves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(lotus, have leaves)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(lotus, leaves answer)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(lotus, leaves answer)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(lotus, leaves answer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(lotus, leaves float on water)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(lotus, leaves float on water)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(lotus, leaves float on water)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(lotus, leaves float)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(lotus, leaves float)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lotus, leaves float)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(lotus, have broad leaves)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(lotus, have broad leaves)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(lotus, have broad leaves)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(lotus, leaves answer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(lotus, leaves float on water)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lotus, have waxy leaves)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lotus, have waxy leaves)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(lotus, have waxy leaves)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(lotus, leaves float)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(lotus, have broad leaves)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(lotus, have waxy leaves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(lotus, have leaves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(lotus, have leaves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hibiscus, have leaves)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(lotus, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hydrangea, have leaves)