louisiana: has state state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.61
, location
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
, country
Weight: 0.58
Siblings louis armstrong
Weight: 0.64
, mississippi
Weight: 0.58
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.58
, alabama
Weight: 0.35
, south carolina
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state state 1.00
be state has 0.97
be called state 0.89
is red state 0.81
is poor state 0.79
have seven districts 0.76
is republican state 0.76
have seven congressional districts 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is red state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be called state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, is red state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is republican state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, be called state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, has state state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(alabama, has state state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(oklahoma, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, be called state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(mississippi, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(mississippi, be called state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(alabama, be called state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(mississippi, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is red state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is poor state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(alabama, is poor state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(oklahoma, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, is red state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(alabama, is red state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mississippi, is republican state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is republican state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(louisiana, has state state)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(louisiana, be called state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, is red state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, is republican state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, is poor state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, have seven districts)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, have seven congressional districts)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(louisiana, is republican state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(louisiana, is republican state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(louisiana, be called state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(louisiana, be state has)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(louisiana, be called state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(louisiana, be state has)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(louisiana, is poor state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(louisiana, is red state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(louisiana, be state has)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(louisiana, is republican state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(louisiana, have seven districts)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(louisiana, is red state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(louisiana, is poor state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(louisiana, have seven congressional districts)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(louisiana, is red state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(louisiana, have seven districts)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(louisiana, is poor state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(louisiana, have seven congressional districts)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(louisiana, have seven districts)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(louisiana, have seven congressional districts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(louisiana, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(mississippi, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(oklahoma, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be called state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mississippi, is republican state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mississippi, is red state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mississippi, is poor state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(alabama, is poor state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(oklahoma, is red state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(alabama, is red state)