love: be harder in winter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents love song
Weight: 0.70
, ideal
Weight: 0.66
, element
Weight: 0.64
, magic
Weight: 0.64
Siblings grace
Weight: 0.70
, romance
Weight: 0.61
, affection
Weight: 0.57
, sorrow
Weight: 0.56
, agape
Weight: 0.49

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harder in winter 1.00
is hard 0.80
is difficult 0.78
be stronger than than love 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(ideal, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(love, be harder in winter)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(ideal, is difficult)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ideal, is difficult)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(affection, is hard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(romance, is difficult)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(grace, is hard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(romance, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(ideal, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(love, be harder in winter)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(romance, is hard)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(romance, is hard)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(romance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(romance, is difficult)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(affection, is hard)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(affection, is hard)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(grace, is hard)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(grace, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(love, be harder in winter)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(love, is difficult)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(love, is difficult)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(love, is difficult)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(love, be stronger than than love)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(love, is difficult)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(love, is hard)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(love, is hard)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(love, is hard)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(love, is hard)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(love, be stronger than than love)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(love, be stronger than than love)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(love, be stronger than than love)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(love, be harder in winter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(love, be harder in winter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ideal, is difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(romance, is hard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(affection, is hard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(romance, is difficult)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(grace, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(love, be harder in winter)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ideal, is difficult)