love: be important in relationship

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents love song
Weight: 0.70
, ideal
Weight: 0.66
, element
Weight: 0.64
, magic
Weight: 0.64
Siblings grace
Weight: 0.70
, romance
Weight: 0.61
, affection
Weight: 0.57
, sorrow
Weight: 0.56
, agape
Weight: 0.49

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in relationship 1.00
be important in friendship 0.86
complicate friendship 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(love, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(affection, be important in relationship)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(love, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(affection, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(affection, be important in relationship)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(love, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(love, be important in relationship)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(love, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(love, be important in friendship)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(love, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(love, be important in friendship)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(love, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(love, be important in friendship)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(love, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(love, complicate friendship)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(love, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(love, complicate friendship)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(love, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(love, complicate friendship)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(love, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(love, be important in friendship)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(love, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(love, complicate friendship)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(love, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(love, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(love, be important in relationship)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(love, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(love, be important in relationship)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(love, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(affection, be important in relationship)