love: wants to cook meal

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ideal
Weight: 0.66
, element
Weight: 0.64
, magic
Weight: 0.64
, fairy tale
Weight: 0.64
Siblings grace
Weight: 0.70
, romance
Weight: 0.61
, affection
Weight: 0.57
, sorrow
Weight: 0.56
, hatred
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
wants to cook meal 1.00
wants to cook dinner 0.95
wants to cook 0.93
be at dinner 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(love, wants to cook meal)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(romance, wants to cook dinner)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(love, wants to cook meal)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(romance, wants to cook)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(love, wants to cook meal)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(romance, wants to cook dinner)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(romance, wants to cook dinner)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(love, wants to cook meal)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(romance, wants to cook)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(romance, wants to cook)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(love, wants to cook meal)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(love, wants to cook meal)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(love, wants to cook meal)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(love, be at dinner)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(love, wants to cook meal)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(love, be at dinner)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(love, wants to cook meal)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(love, be at dinner)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(love, wants to cook meal)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(love, be at dinner)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(love, wants to cook meal)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(love, wants to cook meal)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(love, wants to cook meal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(love, wants to cook meal)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(love, wants to cook meal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(love, wants to cook meal)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(romance, wants to cook dinner)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(love, wants to cook meal)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(romance, wants to cook)