loyalty: was important in system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.67
, virtue
Weight: 0.66
, quality
Weight: 0.65
, value
Weight: 0.65
, gift
Weight: 0.63
Siblings honesty
Weight: 0.35
, patriotism
Weight: 0.35
, kindness
Weight: 0.34
, faith
Weight: 0.34
, commitment
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important in system 1.00
has quality system 0.85
be important in beowulf 0.83
be in formation systems important 0.82
be important to self-esteem 0.81
is more important 0.78
be important component of culture 0.78
is important quality 0.78
be important in services 0.77
be important at work 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(loyalty, was important in system)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(quality, be in formation systems important)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(loyalty, was important in system)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(value, be important component of culture)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(loyalty, was important in system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality system)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(quality, be in formation systems important)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(value, be important component of culture)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(value, be important component of culture)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(quality, be in formation systems important)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(commitment, be important at work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be important at work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(kindness, is important quality)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(honesty, is important quality)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(faith, is important quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(loyalty, was important in system)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(quality, be in formation systems important)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(loyalty, was important in system)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(value, be important component of culture)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(loyalty, was important in system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(faith, is important quality)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(faith, is important quality)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(commitment, be important at work)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(commitment, be important at work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(kindness, is important quality)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(kindness, is important quality)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(honesty, is important quality)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(honesty, is important quality)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(honesty, be important at work)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(honesty, be important at work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(loyalty, was important in system)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, be important in beowulf)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(loyalty, be important to self-esteem)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, be important to self-esteem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, is more important)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, is important quality)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, be important at work)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(loyalty, is more important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(loyalty, be important to self-esteem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(loyalty, be important in beowulf)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(loyalty, is important quality)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(loyalty, is more important)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(loyalty, be important in beowulf)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(loyalty, be important to self-esteem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(loyalty, is more important)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(loyalty, be important at work)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(loyalty, is important quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(loyalty, be important at work)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(loyalty, be important in beowulf)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(loyalty, is important quality)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(loyalty, be important at work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(loyalty, was important in system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(quality, be in formation systems important)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(value, be important component of culture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(commitment, be important at work)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(kindness, is important quality)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(faith, is important quality)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(honesty, be important at work)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(honesty, is important quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(quality, be in formation systems important)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(loyalty, was important in system)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(value, be important component of culture)