luck: be bad luck in theatre

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
, force
Weight: 0.56
, word
Weight: 0.56
Siblings good luck
Weight: 0.37
, karma
Weight: 0.34
, bad weather
Weight: 0.33
, good weather
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad luck in theatre 1.00
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(luck, be bad luck in theatre)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(luck, be bad luck in theatre)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(word, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(luck, be bad luck in theatre)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(word, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(luck, be bad luck in theatre)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(good luck, be bad luck in theatre)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(luck, be bad luck in theatre)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(karma, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(luck, be bad luck in theatre)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(luck, be bad luck in theatre)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(luck, be bad luck in theatre)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(good luck, be bad luck in theatre)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(good luck, be bad luck in theatre)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(luck, be bad luck in theatre)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(karma, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(karma, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(luck, be bad luck in theatre)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(luck, be bad luck in theatre)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(luck, be bad luck in theatre)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(luck, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(luck, be bad luck in theatre)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(luck, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(luck, be bad luck in theatre)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(luck, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(luck, be bad luck in theatre)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(luck, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(luck, be bad luck in theatre)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(luck, be bad luck in theatre)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(luck, be bad luck in theatre)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(luck, be bad luck in theatre)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(luck, be bad luck in theatre)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(luck, be bad luck in theatre)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(luck, be bad luck in theatre)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(good luck, be bad luck in theatre)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(luck, be bad luck in theatre)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(karma, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(luck, be bad luck in theatre)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)