lug: has quality wheels

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents detail
Weight: 0.50
, hardware
Weight: 0.50
, device
Weight: 0.49
, accessory
Weight: 0.45
Siblings strap
Weight: 0.30
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.30
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.30
, projector
Weight: 0.30
, floppy disk
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality wheels 1.00
is ford wheels 0.81
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(lug, has quality wheels)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(lug, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(lug, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(lug, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(lug, has quality wheels)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(lug, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(lug, has quality wheels)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(lug, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lug, is ford wheels)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(lug, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(lug, is ford wheels)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(lug, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(lug, is ford wheels)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(lug, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lug, is ford wheels)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(lug, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(lug, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(lug, has quality wheels)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(lug, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(lug, has quality wheels)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(lug, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(lug, has quality wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)