lunch: be bad meat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meal
Weight: 0.67
, dinner
Weight: 0.63
, free time
Weight: 0.61
, hour
Weight: 0.58
, program
Weight: 0.58
Siblings breakfast
Weight: 0.37
, brunch
Weight: 0.37
, supper
Weight: 0.36
, salad
Weight: 0.36
, hamburger
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad meat 1.00
is meat 0.95
is meat red 0.91
be made from cow meat 0.87
be more expensive than meat 0.86
is beef 0.83
be called beef burgers 0.83
be with chicken 0.83
be made out of beef 0.82
be made from beef 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(meal, be with chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lunch, be bad meat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(meal, be with chicken)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(meal, be with chicken)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, is meat)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, is meat red)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be made from cow meat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than meat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be made out of beef)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be made from beef)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be called beef burgers)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, is beef)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(meal, be with chicken) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(lunch, be bad meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(hamburger, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(hamburger, is meat)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(hamburger, be made from cow meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be made from cow meat)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(hamburger, is meat red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(hamburger, is meat red)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(hamburger, is beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(hamburger, is beef)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(salad, be more expensive than meat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(hamburger, be called beef burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be called beef burgers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(hamburger, be made from beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be made from beef)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(hamburger, be made out of beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be made out of beef)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(lunch, be bad meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be bad meat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lunch, be bad meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(meal, be with chicken)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hamburger, is meat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hamburger, be made from cow meat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(hamburger, is beef)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hamburger, is meat red)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(salad, be more expensive than meat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hamburger, be made from beef)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hamburger, be made out of beef)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(hamburger, be called beef burgers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(lunch, be bad meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(meal, be with chicken)