lunch: be cheaper than dinner at restaurants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meal
Weight: 0.67
, dinner
Weight: 0.63
, free time
Weight: 0.61
, hour
Weight: 0.58
, program
Weight: 0.58
Siblings breakfast
Weight: 0.37
, brunch
Weight: 0.37
, supper
Weight: 0.36
, salad
Weight: 0.36
, hamburger
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than dinner at restaurants 1.00
be cheaper than dinner 0.94
be expensive in restaurants 0.90
be more important than dinner 0.89
taste better at restaurants 0.87
be more expensive than lunch 0.87
taste better in restaurants 0.86
be more expensive than burgers 0.86
is dinner 0.86
is restaurants 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(salad, be expensive in restaurants)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, taste better in restaurants)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste better in restaurants)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste better at restaurants)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(breakfast, be more important than dinner)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than burgers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(salad, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(salad, be expensive in restaurants)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(salad, taste better at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(salad, taste better at restaurants)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(salad, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(salad, taste better in restaurants)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(hamburger, taste better in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hamburger, taste better in restaurants)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(breakfast, be more important than dinner)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(breakfast, be more important than dinner)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(salad, be more expensive than burgers)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(salad, be more expensive than burgers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(lunch, is dinner)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(lunch, be cheaper than dinner)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be cheaper than dinner)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(lunch, is dinner)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(lunch, is dinner)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(lunch, is restaurants)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is restaurants)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lunch, be cheaper than dinner)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(lunch, be cheaper than dinner)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is dinner)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(lunch, is restaurants)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lunch, is restaurants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(salad, be expensive in restaurants)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(salad, taste better at restaurants)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(salad, taste better in restaurants)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hamburger, taste better in restaurants)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(salad, be more expensive than burgers)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(breakfast, be more important than dinner)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lunch, be cheaper than dinner at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(dinner, be more expensive than lunch)