lunch: be good

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meal
Weight: 0.67
, dinner
Weight: 0.63
, free time
Weight: 0.61
, hour
Weight: 0.58
, program
Weight: 0.58
Siblings breakfast
Weight: 0.37
, supper
Weight: 0.36
, salad
Weight: 0.36
, hamburger
Weight: 0.35
, pizza
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good 1.00
taste good 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(lunch, be good)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(salad, taste good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(salad, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(lunch, be good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(lunch, be good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(lunch, be good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lunch, be good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(lunch, be good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lunch, be good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch, be good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(salad, taste good)