lutheran: be in upper midwest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents name
Weight: 0.54
, catholic
Weight: 0.53
, roman catholic
Weight: 0.52
, church
Weight: 0.52
Siblings anglican
Weight: 0.33
, methodist
Weight: 0.33
, westminster abbey
Weight: 0.32
, charles darwin
Weight: 0.32
, albert einstein
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in upper midwest 1.00
be clustered in upper midwest 0.92
be in midwest 0.89
be clustered in midwest 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(lutheran, be in upper midwest)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(lutheran, be in upper midwest)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(lutheran, be in upper midwest)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lutheran, be in midwest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(lutheran, be in upper midwest)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(lutheran, be in midwest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(lutheran, be in upper midwest)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(lutheran, be in midwest)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(lutheran, be in upper midwest)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(lutheran, be clustered in upper midwest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(lutheran, be in upper midwest)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(lutheran, be clustered in upper midwest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(lutheran, be in upper midwest)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lutheran, be clustered in upper midwest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(lutheran, be in upper midwest)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lutheran, be clustered in upper midwest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(lutheran, be in upper midwest)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lutheran, be clustered in midwest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(lutheran, be in upper midwest)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(lutheran, be clustered in midwest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(lutheran, be in upper midwest)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lutheran, be in midwest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(lutheran, be in upper midwest)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(lutheran, be clustered in midwest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(lutheran, be in upper midwest)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lutheran, be clustered in midwest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(lutheran, be in upper midwest)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(lutheran, be in upper midwest)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(lutheran, be in upper midwest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(lutheran, be in upper midwest)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(lutheran, be in upper midwest)