lyme disease: be classified as emerging infection

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disease
Weight: 0.86
, infection
Weight: 0.81
, illness
Weight: 0.77
, virus
Weight: 0.72
Siblings pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.41
, candidiasis
Weight: 0.39
, bubonic plague
Weight: 0.39
, cancer
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be classified as emerging infection 1.00
be classified as infection 0.94
be classified 0.77
be called disease 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(disease, be classified)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(illness, be classified)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(illness, be classified)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(disease, be classified)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(disease, be classified)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(illness, be classified)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cancer, be classified)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(disease, be classified)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(illness, be classified)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cancer, be classified)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(cancer, be classified)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(lyme disease, be classified as infection)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified as infection)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be classified as infection)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be classified as infection)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be called disease)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be called disease)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(lyme disease, be called disease)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(lyme disease, be classified)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be classified)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be classified)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be called disease)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(illness, be classified)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(disease, be classified)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cancer, be classified)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(illness, be classified)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(lyme disease, be classified as emerging infection)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(disease, be classified)