lymph node: fighting infection

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.70
, breast cancer
Weight: 0.69
, bone marrow
Weight: 0.68
, lymphatic system
Weight: 0.64
Siblings salivary gland
Weight: 0.68
, spleen
Weight: 0.63
, tonsil
Weight: 0.63
, lymph
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
fighting infection 1.00
fight infection 0.97
become during infection 0.87
be prone to infection 0.86
swell during infection 0.84
get infected 0.79
enlarge during infection 0.79
is infected 0.79
has state virus 0.77
enlarge during infections 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tonsil, be prone to infection)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(salivary gland, has state virus)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(salivary gland, get infected)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tonsil, get infected)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tonsil, is infected)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(tonsil, is infected)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tonsil, is infected)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(tonsil, be prone to infection)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tonsil, be prone to infection)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tonsil, get infected)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(tonsil, get infected)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(salivary gland, get infected)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(salivary gland, get infected)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(salivary gland, has state virus)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(salivary gland, has state virus)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(lymph node, fighting infection)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lymph node, fight infection)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, fight infection)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(lymph node, become during infection)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(lymph node, fight infection)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(lymph node, fight infection)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(lymph node, swell during infection)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(lymph node, get infected)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(lymph node, become during infection)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(lymph node, enlarge during infection)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, get infected)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(lymph node, enlarge during infections)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(lymph node, get infected)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, swell during infection)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(lymph node, swell during infection)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(lymph node, enlarge during infection)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(lymph node, get infected)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(lymph node, enlarge during infections)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(lymph node, become during infection)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, enlarge during infections)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, enlarge during infection)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, become during infection)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(lymph node, swell during infection)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(lymph node, enlarge during infection)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(lymph node, enlarge during infections)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, fighting infection)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(lymph node, fighting infection)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(salivary gland, get infected)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tonsil, be prone to infection)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tonsil, is infected)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(salivary gland, has state virus)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, fighting infection)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(tonsil, get infected)