lyric: is have frequently dodgy sites

Property	Similarity
is have frequently dodgy sites	1.00
is have dodgy sites	0.97
is have frequently sites	0.87
have bad sites	0.84
have bad websites	0.80
have sh*t sites	0.79
have sites	0.79
is have sites	0.79
have terrible websites	0.78
have websites	0.75

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(lyric, is have dodgy sites)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(lyric, is have dodgy sites)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Salient(lyric, is have dodgy sites)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(lyric, is have dodgy sites)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(lyric, have sites)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(lyric, is have sites)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(lyric, have sh*t sites)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(lyric, have sh*t sites)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(lyric, have websites)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Salient(lyric, have sh*t sites)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(lyric, have bad websites)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(lyric, have bad websites)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(lyric, have bad websites)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(lyric, have sites)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(lyric, have sh*t sites)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(lyric, is have sites)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(lyric, have websites)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(lyric, have terrible websites)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(lyric, have bad websites)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(lyric, have bad sites)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(lyric, have terrible websites)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(lyric, is have frequently sites)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(lyric, have terrible websites)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(lyric, have terrible websites)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(lyric, have bad sites)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(lyric, have websites)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(lyric, have sites)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(lyric, have bad sites)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(lyric, is have sites)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(lyric, have bad sites)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently sites)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(lyric, is have frequently sites)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(lyric, is have frequently sites)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(lyric, have websites)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(lyric, is have sites)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(lyric, have sites)

Parents	word Weight: 0.70 , love song Weight: 0.66 , song Weight: 0.63 , content Weight: 0.58
Siblings	verse Weight: 0.36 , f word Weight: 0.35 , phrase Weight: 0.35 , cunt Weight: 0.35 , album Weight: 0.34

lyric: is have frequently dodgy sites

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible