lyric: is have frequently sites

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents word
Weight: 0.70
, love song
Weight: 0.66
, song
Weight: 0.63
, content
Weight: 0.58
Siblings verse
Weight: 0.36
, f word
Weight: 0.35
, phrase
Weight: 0.35
, cunt
Weight: 0.35
, album
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is have frequently sites 1.00
is have sites 0.91
have sh*t sites 0.91
have sites 0.91
have bad sites 0.89
is have frequently dodgy sites 0.87
have websites 0.81
have bad websites 0.80
is have dodgy sites 0.78
have terrible websites 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(lyric, is have frequently sites)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(lyric, have sites)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(lyric, is have sites)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(lyric, have sh*t sites)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(lyric, have sh*t sites)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(lyric, have sh*t sites)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(lyric, have sites)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(lyric, is have sites)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(lyric, have sh*t sites)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(lyric, have sites)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(lyric, is have sites)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(lyric, have websites)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(lyric, have bad sites)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(lyric, is have frequently dodgy sites)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(lyric, have bad websites)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(lyric, have websites)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(lyric, have bad websites)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lyric, have bad sites)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(lyric, is have dodgy sites)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lyric, is have dodgy sites)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(lyric, have bad sites)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(lyric, have bad websites)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lyric, have bad sites)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(lyric, have websites)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(lyric, is have dodgy sites)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(lyric, have terrible websites)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(lyric, have bad websites)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lyric, is have dodgy sites)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(lyric, have terrible websites)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(lyric, have terrible websites)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(lyric, have terrible websites)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(lyric, is have sites)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(lyric, have sites)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(lyric, have websites)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(lyric, is have frequently sites)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(lyric, is have frequently sites)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lyric, is have frequently sites)