mac: be good for graphic design

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents personal computer
Weight: 0.66
, web browser
Weight: 0.64
, server
Weight: 0.64
, machine
Weight: 0.63
, computer
Weight: 0.57
Siblings linux
Weight: 0.67
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.35
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for graphic design 1.00
be better for graphic design 0.99
be for graphic design 0.99
be for best graphic design 0.98
be used for graphic design 0.98
be preferred for graphic design 0.95
be better for graphic sound 0.91
be good for design 0.88
be for design 0.86
be better for design 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(mac, be good for graphic design)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mac, be better for graphic design)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mac, be used for graphic design)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mac, be better for graphic design)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mac, be preferred for graphic design)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mac, be used for graphic design)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(mac, be better for graphic design)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(mac, be used for graphic design)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(mac, be preferred for graphic design)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(mac, be preferred for graphic design)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mac, be good for design)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mac, be for design)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mac, be better for design)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mac, be used for graphic design)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(mac, be good for design)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mac, be better for graphic design)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(mac, be for design)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(mac, be good for design)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(mac, be better for design)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mac, be preferred for graphic design)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(mac, be for design)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(mac, be better for design)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mac, be for design)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mac, be good for design)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mac, be better for design)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mac, be good for graphic design)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mac, be good for graphic design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mac, be good for graphic design)