mac: be good for music production

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents personal computer
Weight: 0.66
, web browser
Weight: 0.64
, server
Weight: 0.64
, machine
Weight: 0.63
, computer
Weight: 0.57
Siblings linux
Weight: 0.67
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.35
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for music production 1.00
be better for music production 0.98
be used for music 0.83
be popular with music 0.81
be good for video editing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(mac, be good for music production)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(mac, be good for music production)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(mac, be good for music production)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(mac, be used for music)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mac, be good for music production)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mac, be used for music)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(mac, be good for music production)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(mac, be popular with music)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(mac, be good for music production)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(mac, be used for music)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mac, be good for music production)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mac, be popular with music)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(mac, be good for music production)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mac, be popular with music)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(mac, be good for music production)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(mac, be good for video editing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mac, be good for music production)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mac, be good for video editing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(mac, be good for music production)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(mac, be good for video editing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(mac, be good for music production)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mac, be good for video editing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(mac, be good for music production)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mac, be popular with music)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(mac, be good for music production)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(mac, be used for music)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(mac, be good for music production)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mac, be good for music production)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mac, be good for music production)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(mac, be good for music production)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mac, be good for music production)