mac: be make up popular brand

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents personal computer
Weight: 0.66
, web browser
Weight: 0.64
, server
Weight: 0.64
, machine
Weight: 0.63
, computer
Weight: 0.57
Siblings linux
Weight: 0.67
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.35
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be make up popular brand 1.00
is popular 0.79
be popular with music 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(computer, is popular)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mac, be make up popular brand)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(machine, is popular)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mac, be make up popular brand)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(machine, is popular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(computer, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(machine, is popular)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(computer, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(linux, is popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(computer, is popular)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mac, be make up popular brand)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(machine, is popular)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mac, be make up popular brand)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(linux, is popular)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(linux, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(mac, be make up popular brand)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(mac, is popular)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mac, is popular)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(mac, be popular with music)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mac, is popular)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mac, be popular with music)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mac, be popular with music)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mac, is popular)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mac, be popular with music)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mac, be make up popular brand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mac, be make up popular brand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(machine, is popular)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(computer, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(linux, is popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(machine, is popular)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(mac, be make up popular brand)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(computer, is popular)