mac: be more expensive than pc

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents personal computer
Weight: 0.66
, web browser
Weight: 0.64
, server
Weight: 0.64
, machine
Weight: 0.63
, computer
Weight: 0.57
Siblings linux
Weight: 0.67
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.35
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than pc 1.00
be better than pc 0.94
be much better than than pc 0.94
be better than windows pc 0.88
be more expensive than pcs 0.85
be less powerful than other pcs 0.82
cost more than pcs 0.82
be less powerful than pcs 0.82
be faster than pcs 0.81
be more reliable than pcs 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(mac, be more expensive than pc)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mac, be better than pc)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(mac, be better than pc)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(mac, be better than pc)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(mac, be faster than pcs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mac, cost more than pcs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mac, be better than pc)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(mac, be faster than pcs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(mac, be faster than pcs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(mac, cost more than pcs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(mac, be faster than pcs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(mac, cost more than pcs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(mac, be more reliable than pcs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mac, be more reliable than pcs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(mac, be more reliable than pcs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mac, be more reliable than pcs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mac, cost more than pcs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mac, be more expensive than pc)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mac, be more expensive than pc)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mac, be more expensive than pc)