mac: be more reliable than pcs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents personal computer
Weight: 0.66
, web browser
Weight: 0.64
, server
Weight: 0.64
, machine
Weight: 0.63
, computer
Weight: 0.57
Siblings linux
Weight: 0.67
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.35
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more reliable than pcs 1.00
be more expensive than pcs 0.94
be less powerful than pcs 0.93
be better than pcs 0.93
cost more than pcs 0.93
be less powerful than other pcs 0.93
be faster than pcs 0.92
be superior to pcs 0.90
have less memory than pcs 0.89
seem last longer than pcs 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(mac, be more reliable than pcs)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(mac, be faster than pcs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(mac, be faster than pcs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mac, cost more than pcs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(mac, be faster than pcs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(mac, be faster than pcs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mac, be more expensive than pcs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mac, be better than pcs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(mac, be better than pcs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(mac, cost more than pcs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(mac, cost more than pcs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(mac, be better than pcs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(mac, have less memory than pcs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(mac, have less memory than pcs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(mac, have less memory than pcs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mac, be better than pcs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mac, have less memory than pcs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mac, cost more than pcs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mac, be more reliable than pcs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(mac, be more reliable than pcs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mac, be more reliable than pcs)