mac: be popular with music

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents personal computer
Weight: 0.66
, web browser
Weight: 0.64
, server
Weight: 0.64
, machine
Weight: 0.63
, computer
Weight: 0.57
Siblings linux
Weight: 0.67
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.35
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular with music 1.00
be used for music 0.89
is popular 0.84
be good for music production 0.81
be better for music production 0.79
be make up popular brand 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(computer, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mac, be popular with music)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(machine, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mac, be popular with music)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(machine, is popular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(computer, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(machine, is popular)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(computer, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(linux, is popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(computer, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mac, be popular with music)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(machine, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mac, be popular with music)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(linux, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(linux, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(mac, be popular with music)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(mac, be used for music)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mac, be used for music)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(mac, be used for music)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(mac, is popular)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mac, is popular)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(mac, be good for music production)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mac, is popular)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mac, be good for music production)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(mac, be good for music production)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(mac, be make up popular brand)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mac, be make up popular brand)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mac, be make up popular brand)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(mac, be used for music)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mac, is popular)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mac, be good for music production)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mac, be make up popular brand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mac, be popular with music)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mac, be popular with music)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(machine, is popular)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(computer, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(linux, is popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(machine, is popular)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mac, be popular with music) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(computer, is popular)