mac: be safer than windows

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents personal computer
Weight: 0.66
, web browser
Weight: 0.64
, server
Weight: 0.64
, machine
Weight: 0.63
, computer
Weight: 0.57
Siblings linux
Weight: 0.67
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.35
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be safer than windows 1.00
be better than windows 0.90
be faster than windows 0.88
be much better than windows 0.88
be more secure than windows 0.87
be smoother than windows 0.87
be different from windows 0.83
run windows 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(linux, be safer than windows)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(linux, be different from windows)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(linux, be better than windows)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(linux, be faster than windows)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(linux, be more secure than windows)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(linux, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(linux, be safer than windows)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(linux, be better than windows)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(linux, be better than windows)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(linux, be faster than windows)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(linux, be faster than windows)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(linux, be more secure than windows)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(linux, be more secure than windows)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(linux, be different from windows)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(linux, be different from windows)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(mac, be safer than windows)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mac, run windows)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(mac, run windows)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mac, be better than windows)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(mac, run windows)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mac, run windows)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mac, be faster than windows)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mac, be smoother than windows)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mac, be more secure than windows)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mac, be much better than windows)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(mac, be faster than windows)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mac, be faster than windows)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mac, be better than windows)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mac, be smoother than windows)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(mac, be smoother than windows)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mac, be different from windows)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(mac, be smoother than windows)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mac, be more secure than windows)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(mac, be faster than windows)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mac, be more secure than windows)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mac, be better than windows)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(mac, be better than windows)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mac, be different from windows)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mac, be much better than windows)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(mac, be more secure than windows)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mac, be different from windows)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(mac, be different from windows)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mac, be much better than windows)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(mac, be much better than windows)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mac, be safer than windows)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mac, be safer than windows)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(linux, be safer than windows)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(linux, be more secure than windows)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(linux, be better than windows)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(linux, be faster than windows)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mac, be safer than windows)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(linux, be different from windows)