macadamia nut: be important to hawaii

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nut
Weight: 0.81
Siblings hazelnut
Weight: 0.37
, almond
Weight: 0.37
, pecan
Weight: 0.37
, crab apple
Weight: 0.35
, acorn
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to hawaii 1.00
be popular in hawaii 0.95
be important to texas 0.79
be in california 0.77
grow in california 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, be important to hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(almond, grow in california)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, be important to hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(pecan, be important to texas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(macadamia nut, be important to hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(almond, grow in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(almond, grow in california)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(macadamia nut, be important to hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(pecan, be important to texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(pecan, be important to texas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(macadamia nut, be important to hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(macadamia nut, be important to hawaii)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(macadamia nut, be important to hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(macadamia nut, be popular in hawaii)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(macadamia nut, be important to hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(macadamia nut, be popular in hawaii)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(macadamia nut, be important to hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(macadamia nut, be popular in hawaii)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(macadamia nut, be important to hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, be popular in hawaii)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(macadamia nut, be important to hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(macadamia nut, be important to hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, be important to hawaii)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(macadamia nut, be important to hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(macadamia nut, be important to hawaii)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, be important to hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(almond, grow in california)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, be important to hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pecan, be important to texas)