macadamia nut: has quality jokes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nut
Weight: 0.81
Siblings hazelnut
Weight: 0.37
, almond
Weight: 0.37
, pecan
Weight: 0.37
, crab apple
Weight: 0.35
, acorn
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality jokes 1.00
jokes 0.94
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(macadamia nut, has quality jokes)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(nut, jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(macadamia nut, has quality jokes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(macadamia nut, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(nut, jokes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(macadamia nut, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(nut, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(nut, jokes)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(nut, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(crab apple, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(acorn, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(nut, jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(macadamia nut, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(macadamia nut, has quality jokes)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nut, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(macadamia nut, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(macadamia nut, has quality jokes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(macadamia nut, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(acorn, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(acorn, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(macadamia nut, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(crab apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(crab apple, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(macadamia nut, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(macadamia nut, has quality jokes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(macadamia nut, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(macadamia nut, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, has quality jokes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(macadamia nut, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(macadamia nut, has quality jokes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(nut, jokes)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(nut, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(acorn, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(crab apple, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(macadamia nut, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(nut, jokes)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(macadamia nut, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(nut, has quality bad)