macadamia nut: taste good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nut
Weight: 0.81
Siblings hazelnut
Weight: 0.37
, almond
Weight: 0.37
, pecan
Weight: 0.37
, crab apple
Weight: 0.35
, acorn
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good 1.00
taste bad 0.97
taste sweet 0.90
taste similar 0.90
make coffee taste better 0.87
taste like chocolate 0.86
taste bitter 0.85
taste better roasted 0.84
taste rancid 0.84
taste roasted 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(nut, taste better roasted)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(macadamia nut, taste good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(nut, taste better roasted)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(nut, taste better roasted)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(almond, taste bitter)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hazelnut, taste rancid)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(pecan, taste bitter)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hazelnut, taste like chocolate)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(almond, taste similar)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pecan, taste sweet)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(almond, taste sweet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(nut, taste better roasted)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(macadamia nut, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(almond, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(almond, taste sweet)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pecan, taste sweet)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(pecan, taste sweet)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(almond, taste bitter)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(almond, taste bitter)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hazelnut, taste rancid)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(hazelnut, taste rancid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hazelnut, taste like chocolate)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(hazelnut, taste like chocolate)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(almond, taste similar)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(almond, taste similar)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(pecan, taste bitter)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(pecan, taste bitter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(macadamia nut, taste good)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(macadamia nut, taste like chocolate)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(macadamia nut, taste like chocolate)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(macadamia nut, taste like chocolate)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, taste like chocolate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, taste good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(macadamia nut, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(nut, taste better roasted)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(hazelnut, taste rancid)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(almond, taste bitter)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(pecan, taste sweet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hazelnut, taste like chocolate)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(almond, taste sweet)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pecan, taste bitter)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(almond, taste similar)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(macadamia nut, taste good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(nut, taste better roasted)