machine gun: were more destructive than shot guns

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gun
Weight: 0.76
, weapon
Weight: 0.73
, firearm
Weight: 0.69
, rifle
Weight: 0.69
Siblings gatling gun
Weight: 0.79
, assault rifle
Weight: 0.73
, uzi
Weight: 0.58
, submachine gun
Weight: 0.42
, chemical weapon
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
were more destructive than shot guns 1.00
were more destructive than single shot guns 0.98
be different from guns 0.86
be different from guns in world war 2 0.84
be worse than weapons 0.82
be worse than other weapons 0.82
be much more destructive than explosives 0.82
be called machine guns 0.80
be more hazardous than weapons 0.80
be much more destructive than traditional explosives 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, be worse than other weapons)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, be worse than weapons)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chemical weapon, be worse than weapons)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than weapons)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(chemical weapon, be worse than other weapons)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than other weapons)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(machine gun, were more destructive than single shot guns)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(machine gun, were more destructive than single shot guns)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(machine gun, were more destructive than single shot guns)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(machine gun, be different from guns)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(machine gun, be different from guns)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(machine gun, be different from guns)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(machine gun, be different from guns in world war 2)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(machine gun, be called machine guns)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(machine gun, were more destructive than single shot guns)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(machine gun, be different from guns in world war 2)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(machine gun, be called machine guns)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(machine gun, be different from guns in world war 2)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(machine gun, be called machine guns)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(machine gun, be different from guns in world war 2)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(machine gun, be different from guns)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(machine gun, be called machine guns)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, be worse than weapons)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, be worse than other weapons)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)