machine: was was invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weapon
Weight: 0.63
, device
Weight: 0.60
, equipment
Weight: 0.60
, sound
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fax machine
Weight: 0.75
, grinder
Weight: 0.72
, treadmill
Weight: 0.71
, engine
Weight: 0.68
, sewing machine
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
was was invented 1.00
was invented 0.98
were invented 0.94
is important invention 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(weapon, were invented)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(machine, was was invented)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(machine, was was invented)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(weapon, were invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(machine, was was invented)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(machine, was was invented)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sewing machine, were invented)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(machine, was was invented)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sewing machine, was was invented)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(machine, was was invented)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sewing machine, is important invention)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(weapon, were invented)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(machine, was was invented)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(machine, was was invented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(machine, was was invented)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sewing machine, was was invented)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(sewing machine, was was invented)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(machine, was was invented)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(sewing machine, were invented)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(sewing machine, were invented)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(machine, was was invented)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(sewing machine, is important invention)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(sewing machine, is important invention)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(machine, was was invented)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(machine, was was invented)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(machine, was was invented)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(machine, was invented)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(machine, was was invented)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(machine, was invented)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(machine, was was invented)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(machine, was invented)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(machine, was was invented)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(machine, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(machine, was was invented)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(machine, was was invented)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(machine, was was invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(machine, was was invented)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(machine, was was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(machine, was was invented)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(weapon, were invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(machine, was was invented)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sewing machine, was was invented)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(machine, was was invented)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(sewing machine, were invented)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(machine, was was invented)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(sewing machine, is important invention)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(machine, was was invented)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(weapon, were invented)