macintosh: be better than windows

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operating system
Weight: 0.62
, computer
Weight: 0.59
, machine
Weight: 0.57
, software
Weight: 0.57
, personal computer
Weight: 0.57
Siblings unix
Weight: 0.36
, solaris
Weight: 0.36
, imac
Weight: 0.35
, mac
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than windows 1.00
be vs windows 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(macintosh, be better than windows)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mac, be better than windows)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(macintosh, be better than windows)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(unix, be better than windows)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(macintosh, be better than windows)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(unix, be better than windows)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(unix, be better than windows)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(macintosh, be better than windows)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mac, be better than windows)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mac, be better than windows)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(macintosh, be better than windows)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(macintosh, be better than windows)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(macintosh, be better than windows)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(macintosh, be vs windows)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(macintosh, be better than windows)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(macintosh, be vs windows)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(macintosh, be better than windows)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(macintosh, be vs windows)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(macintosh, be better than windows)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(macintosh, be vs windows)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(macintosh, be better than windows)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(macintosh, be better than windows)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(macintosh, be better than windows)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(macintosh, be better than windows)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(macintosh, be better than windows)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(macintosh, be better than windows)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(unix, be better than windows)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(macintosh, be better than windows)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mac, be better than windows)