mackerel: be high in calories

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bait
Weight: 0.73
, fish
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.65
, cold water
Weight: 0.58
, variety
Weight: 0.55
Siblings halibut
Weight: 0.38
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.38
, bluefish
Weight: 0.38
, smallmouth bass
Weight: 0.38
, herring
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in calories 1.00
have calories 0.97
have more calories 0.95
be high in fat 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mackerel, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(mackerel, be high in calories)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(mackerel, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(mackerel, have calories)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(mackerel, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mackerel, have more calories)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mackerel, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(mackerel, have calories)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mackerel, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(mackerel, have more calories)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mackerel, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(mackerel, have calories)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(mackerel, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(mackerel, have calories)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mackerel, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(mackerel, have more calories)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(mackerel, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mackerel, be high in fat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(mackerel, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mackerel, have more calories)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mackerel, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(mackerel, be high in fat)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mackerel, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(mackerel, be high in fat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(mackerel, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(mackerel, be high in fat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mackerel, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mackerel, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(mackerel, be high in calories)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mackerel, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mackerel, be high in calories)