mackerel: is cheap

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bait
Weight: 0.73
, fish
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.65
, cold water
Weight: 0.58
, variety
Weight: 0.55
Siblings halibut
Weight: 0.38
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.38
, bluefish
Weight: 0.38
, smallmouth bass
Weight: 0.38
, herring
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cheap 1.00
is expensive 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mackerel, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(halibut, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mackerel, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(herring, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(mackerel, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(herring, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(herring, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(mackerel, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(halibut, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(halibut, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(mackerel, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(mackerel, is cheap)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(mackerel, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mackerel, is expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mackerel, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(mackerel, is expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(mackerel, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(mackerel, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(mackerel, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mackerel, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mackerel, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mackerel, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mackerel, is cheap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(mackerel, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mackerel, is cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mackerel, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(halibut, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mackerel, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(herring, is expensive)