macro: is work important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.57
, action
Weight: 0.54
, command
Weight: 0.53
, method
Weight: 0.52
Siblings commodity
Weight: 0.31
, economy
Weight: 0.31
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.31
, recursion
Weight: 0.31
, fundamental
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is work important 1.00
is work 0.90
work in wildstar 0.88
work 0.87
is social work important 0.87
be important to things 0.85
work on ornata 0.84
is more important 0.84
be important for life 0.82
be important for business 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(action, is more important)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(macro, is work important)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(method, work)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(macro, is work important)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(action, work)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(macro, is work important)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(action, work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(method, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(action, is more important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(action, is more important)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(action, work)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(method, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(recursion, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(economy, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(economy, be important for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(action, is more important)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(macro, is work important)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(method, work)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(macro, is work important)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(action, work)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(macro, is work important)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(recursion, work)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(recursion, work)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(economy, work)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(economy, work)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(economy, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(economy, be important for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(macro, is work important)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(macro, is work)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(macro, is work)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(macro, work in wildstar)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(macro, work)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(macro, work on ornata)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(macro, is work)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(macro, work on ornata)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(macro, work on ornata)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(macro, is social work important)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(macro, work on ornata)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(macro, work)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(macro, work)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(macro, work in wildstar)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(macro, work in wildstar)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(macro, is social work important)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(macro, is social work important)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(macro, work in wildstar)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(macro, is work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(macro, work)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(macro, is social work important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(macro, is work important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(macro, is work important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(action, work)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(method, work)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(action, is more important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(recursion, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(economy, work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(economy, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(action, work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(method, work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(macro, is work important)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(action, is more important)